The dangers of revising Europe's security architecture

Experts warn against revising Europe's security framework because they say it would mean granting Moscow its longstanding wish of renegotiating postwar security on the continent. "It's going to be a big agreement and it's going to involve more than Ukraine," Trump said after meeting Russian presidential envoy Kirill Dmitriev at the White House last week. US envoy Jared Kushner also wrote that Europe and Russia had struggled to establish a sustainable security framework for more than 30 years.
Kushner said he was looking at a "broader" European architecture before he flew to meet with Russian and Ukrainian representatives in Abu Dhabi. European diplomats immediately pushed back on Washington's approach to secure a peace deal in Ukraine because they feared that a peace settlement could restore Russia's sphere of influence and undermine NATO . "We already have European security architecture in place.
NATO and the European Union both have their respective roles.
More world
- परराष्ट्र सचिवसँग भारतीय राजदूतको भेट, द्विदेशीय सहकार्य बढाउनेबारे छलफलNepal Khabar
- 'We have done all our homework' to get EU candidate status: Kosovo's PM Albin KurtiFrance 24
- Tata feud: Venu Srinivasan, Vijay Singh hit back at Khambata, accuse him of ignoring governance failuresThe Hindu
- Manipur probe panel gets sixth extension, no sign of report yetThe Hindu
- CMRL completes tunnelling work for 1-km stretch from Kolathur to Srinivasa NagarThe Hindu
- Ukraine fires nearly 1,200 drones at Russia as U.S.-led talks consider wider European securityThe Hindu