Montana Supreme Court rules 10 extra driving miles aren't enough to change a father's custody plan
Read the full story at Times of India
Adding just 10 miles to a driving route is not a major enough change to justify modifying an existing parenting plan, the Montana Supreme Court has ruled. The decision followed an appeal in case DA 26-0231 (In re the Marriage of Aikins), which began in the Ninth Judicial District Court in Toole County. Justin L. Aikins asked the court to change his existing parenting schedule after his former wife, Loralee J.
Aikins (now Loralee J. Lords), moved to a different home. He argued that the extra distance made it harder for him to spend time with their children. District Judge Gregory L.
Bonilla initially rejected the father's request to change the parenting plan. Aikins then appealed to Montana's highest court. Chief Justice Cory Swanson assigned the case to a panel of five justices to decide whether the lower court had made a mistake by refusing to review the parenting schedule. After reviewing the case, the Montana Supreme Court upheld the lower court's decision.
More society
- US doctor kills building manager after long-running dispute over mould, police sayBBC
- चेक रिपब्लिकलाई २-० ले हराउँदै स्पेन समूहको शीर्ष स्थानमा कायमैRatopati
- Russian court jails rights lawyer for 12 years on treason chargeAl Jazeera
- आजदेखि छठ पर्व सुरु, मिथिला क्षेत्र छठमयRatopati
- Eight killed, including two children, in New York building collapseFrance 24
- Oklahoma homeowner fined $8,528 as Supreme Court restores ban on his short-term rental businessTimes of India